Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.



While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science.  http://baboonzoo3.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33950701-what-is-the-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-structure?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog  includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.