If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
safe distance from cell tower are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. https://ctxt.io/2/AACQKVpzFA include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
https://squareblogs.net/catyarn8/how-far-can-you-get-from-the-5g-mobile-phone-tower-without-being-unsafe overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.