If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In safe distance from cell tower is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.