If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
While this sounds like something that's good however, people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. safe distance to live from cell phone tower include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.